Back to Articles
Nvidia Boss Says There is ‘0% Chance’ AI Destroys the World by 2030

The Guardian

READ

Details

Date Published
21 Sept 2026
Priority Score
3
Australian
No
Created
21 Sept 2026, 10:00 am

Authors (1)

Description

Jensen Huang dismisses warnings from former Anthropic researcher and others as ‘doomsday narratives’

Summary

Jensen Huang dismisses concerns from former Anthropic researchers regarding existential risks, labeling warnings of AI-driven human extinction by 2030 as unscientific 'doomsday narratives.' The article highlights a growing divide between industry leaders who emphasize economic benefits and existing legal liabilities versus researchers and policymakers concerned about catastrophic outcomes like pathogen creation and missile design. It also notes a push for international dialogue and the Tony Blair Institute's warning that current political institutions are unprepared for the pace of AI-driven societal transformation.

Body

Nvidia’s Jensen Huang said predictions of an extinction-level event caused by AI were ‘not grounded in science’. Photograph: Manami Yamada/ReutersView image in fullscreenNvidia’s Jensen Huang said predictions of an extinction-level event caused by AI were ‘not grounded in science’. Photograph: Manami Yamada/ReutersNvidia boss says there is ‘0% chance’ AI destroys the world by 2030Jensen Huang dismisses warnings from former Anthropic researcher and others as ‘doomsday narratives’ Business live – latest updates The boss of the chipmaker Nvidia has said AI will not develop to a point that will lead to the extinction of the human race within a few years, rejecting such assertions as overblown “doomsday narratives”.Jensen Huang, the co-founder and chief executive of the $5tn AI chipmaker, said the claims made on social media by the former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon that AI could become “superhuman” and kill off humanity within the decade was “irresponsible”.“2030 is not going to be the end of the world. There is 0% chance that’s going to be the end of the world,” Huang said in an interview with CBS News. “Scaring people is unnecessary. It is irresponsible.”AI slowdown calls justified but collapse of bubble may be more immediate threat | Heather StewartRead moreCoxon’s remarks, which were backed by two other researchers at the maker of the AI Claude, prompted an international debate about the dangers and lack of oversight of AI as companies race to develop ever more powerful models.US lawmakers have criticised AI companies over the risks and Anthropic published a threat intelligence report detailing how criminals, state-sponsored groups, spyware vendors, scientists and propagandists have tried to use its powerful AI models to design missiles and bombs, create deadly pathogens and spy on dissidents.Dario Amodei, the chief executive of Anthropic, Sam Altman, the boss of the ChatGPT maker OpenAI, and Elon Musk have called for development of the technology to be slowed down.However, Donald Trump has dismissed anxiety over the AI development as a “hoax” and a “conspiracy”, adding that a slowdown could give China the edge.On Sunday, Scott Bessent, the US Treasury secretary, said the US and China had agreed to set up an AI dialogue mechanism to alert each other to help contain the technology’s potential dangers.Huang insisted that predictions of an extinction-level event caused by AI were “not grounded in science”.“Our company’s success is directly connected to the safe deployment of products and services,” he said. “If we don’t continue to do that, our value would be diminished. You have all kinds of liabilities associated with cybersecurity [and damage liability laws]. Apply that first. Don’t let this doomsday narrative allow someone to relieve them of the laws that currently exist.”skip past newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotionOn Monday the the Tony Blair Institute (TBI) thinktank published a paper arguing that countries risk “profound and compounding disadvantage” if they fail to embrace AI and fall behind other nations.However, the TBI also warned that the institutions meant to support the choices leaders will have to make are not equipped to do so.“The previous [industrial] revolution transformed our world over generations, AI will do so within a decade,” said Tony Blair in a foreword to the paper. “New capabilities are emerging at an extraordinary pace, with profound implications for economies, education, science, labour markets, public services and national security. But the risks are equally profound and growing, and so too is public concern. Today’s political leaders… must make hard choices that will signficantly alter their countries’ trajectories. However, the institutions of the modern state meant to support political leaders in making these choices are simply not equipped for what is coming.”Explore more on these topicsAI (artificial intelligence)NvidiaComputingTechnology sectornewsShareReuse this content