Back to Articles
How Prepared Is Australia for Its First AI Election?

Unknown

SKIPPED

Details

Date Published
23 July 2024
Priority Score
4
Australian
Yes
Created
8 Mar 2025, 12:37 pm

Authors (1)

Description

The next federal election, taking place before May 2025, will be the first since the widespread introduction of generative AI.

Summary

The upcoming federal election in Australia is set to be influenced by generative AI, including the controversial use of deep fakes. The article highlights concerns from politicians and experts about the spread of misinformation and the lack of regulatory measures to curb AI-generated content's potential impact on democracy. It calls for stronger legal frameworks and transparency to maintain public trust in electoral processes. This development signifies a pivotal moment for AI governance and the need for ethical considerations in political campaigning, underscoring the critical role of effective policy in preventing AI-induced electoral disruptions.

Body

AdvertisementAustralian Politics‘Appalling’: AI and deep fakes no longer off limits in Australian politicsParker McKenzieJul 23, 2024, updatedJul 23, 2024ShareSource: Queensland LNPAustralian political parties are embracing what has been described as “appalling and disgusting” deep fakes and other generative AI, with few regulatory or legal barriers stopping their use to influence elections.Queensland Premier Steven Miles called the use of generative AI and deep fake content “appalling” after the Queensland Liberal-Nationals Partyposted a videoof the premier dancing on TikTok with a caption that criticised him for posting videos on the platform during a cost-of-living crisis.His federal colleagues who run the Australian Labor Party’s TikTok page had previously posted a video of Peter Dutton in thesame format in June.Professor Toby Walsh, chief scientist at the University of New South Wales’s AI Institute, said there needs to be legal and regulatory barriers to the use and dissemination of AI-generated content.“The technology is evolving very rapidly and unless you are in the room and see it with your own eyes, you can’t say for sure if it is synthetic or not,” he said.“One hundred-plus years ago when we invented photography, we invented fake photography at the same time, but the difference is the technology has been very democratised. It used to be you needed some skill and sophistication to access it.”Miles said: “It’s appalling and disgusting that David Crisafulli has stooped to using AI and deep fake videos to attack me … In a time when misinformation is everywhere, we as politicians have a duty to communicate with our audiences and to voters clearly and honestly.”Electoral impactIn May, a parliamentary committee heard that the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) did not believe it had the legislative tools or internal technical capability to handle false AI-generated images during elections.AEC commissioner Tom Rogers told the committee that voice-cloned robocalls – like those that resulted in a man beingfined $6 million in America– wouldn’t necessarily be illegal under current laws.The same technology is being used in Australia, with Sean O’Reilly, a Dandenong councillor,creating rap songs in languages he doesn’t speakto appeal to Vietnamese, Chinese and Khmer constituents.Evan Ekin-Smyth, the AEC’s national spokesperson, said this will be the first federal election in Australia where AI is potentially used as a part of campaigning or political commentary in a prominent way.“Elections internationally in recent times have seen it in different ways, be it deceased former President Suharto appearing in a deep fake during the Indonesian election or Eminem apparently endorsing a candidate in South Africa,” he said.“To think Australian elections will be immune to that potential is perhaps naive.”He said the rise of AI provides societal opportunities and challenges.“It’s important not to overstate the danger of AI because we know that can undermine public trust in all forms of communication,” Ekin-Smyth said.“AI is a force multiplier for electoral disinformation, but it’s still only as useful as the individuals behind the keyboard.”Social responsibilityZoe Hawkins, head of policy design at ANU’s Tech Policy Design Centre, suggested a requirement to label AI-generated content when it is used in advertising and politics would be a good place to start.“The way the public debates is important. We need to make sure we don’t erode trust in democracy as a self-fulfilling prophecy,” she said.“We have to be mindful about how we discuss this policy challenge. It’s about keeping Australians confident in the integrity of the process.”Although the use of artificial intelligence wasn’t common in the British general election, the Reform Party wasfalsely accused of running AI-generated candidates.Walsh agreed with Hawkins’ suggestion and also added that more needs to be done to hold social media companies accountable.“We saw what happened with Cambridge Analytica, and what worries me is that should have been a wake-up call,” Walsh said.“Social media was a cheap, effective way to reach into people’s lives and we’re now about to supercharge that by adding persuasive AI-generated fake content.”Topics:Artificial Intelligence,Federal electionShareFollow The New DailyAdvertisementMore Australian Politics>Australian PoliticsDutton skipped caravan briefings to 'stoke fear'Australian PoliticsEx-PM reignites Trump spat despite trade worriesOpinionInfluencers looking to win your vote this electionOpinionCount on Coalition under Dutton to live in the pastOpinionWomen face big economic question this electionOpinionAlbanese beset, from Alfred to Donald TrumpAustralian PoliticsFederal Labor scores first poll win in eight monthsOpinionWhat would a minority government look like?Australian PoliticsDutton flees cyclone zone for Sydney event