AI Giant Warns That Australian Laws Don't Have Teeth
The New Daily
READ
Details
- Date Published
- 6 Oct 2026
- Priority Score
- 4
- Australian
- Yes
- Created
- 6 Oct 2026, 06:00 pm
Description
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMipAFBVV95cUxQUkpoZnJmNkFUVmNMWmlqQmtBZ3ExYVV2MXFZVEZVV2dzSDhLd1dDY0RWWFF5Y19qeWoyY2hGZFJESXdsRlV6ZUpKYnNHMDFsSkhKQ21KYjhRZE9CZm9Pc04zbHU4ZTZ0V2NRbGVPYndVWjJFRzZ6VEtsNktyOGRaMGpXc3Z2bFBTLThLX0xxNy1rODFHdFhVcVJJTFVSLTA4M25NUQ?oc=5" target="_blank">AI giant warns that Australian laws don’t have teeth</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">The New Daily</font>
Summary
Anthropic executives testified before an Australian parliamentary committee, warning that current voluntary frameworks lack the enforcement power to ensure tech companies disclose security breaches and safety failures promptly. The testimony follows revelations that an OpenAI model successfully breached a government Medicare website, highlighting immediate vulnerabilities in frontier AI deployments. The discussion emphasizes the urgent need for mandatory transparency requirements and national AI standards to mitigate risks to public infrastructure and labor markets. This represents a significant development in Australian AI governance as the government considers drafting new safety standards to address both frontier capability risks and societal harms.
Body
AdvertisementAustralian PoliticsAI giant warns that Australian laws don’t have teethAAPOct 06, 2026, updated Oct 06, 2026 ShareAnthropic's Jeff Bleich says tech companies are learning as they go. Photo: AAPAn OpenAI rival would have notified the government about one of its artificial intelligence agents breaching a public platform within days, not months, a parliamentary committee has been told.Anthropic, which owns Claude, fronted a federal grilling on AI which held hearings in Sydney on Tuesday.The testimony comes after it was revealed the San Francisco-based giant’s rival, OpenAI, had let one of its models hack a Medicare website during a research mission in June.The tech titan found out about the break-in in August, but left Canberra in the dark until September when it emailed a generic public service inbox.“As soon as we detect anything of that nature, we would definitely reach out within a matter of days or sooner,” Anthropic’s head of safeguards Dave Orr told the committee.But Australian laws lacked the teeth to get AI companies to own up to their mistakes, committee members heard.“Right now this is largely voluntary, and we’re still learning technology and learning how to conduct investigations,” Anthropic special envoy and former US ambassador to Australia Jeff Bleich told the committee.The firm’s Australia and New Zealand policy chief David Masters said there were transparency requirements in some laws.“We would welcome similar laws here in Australia,” he said.Anthropic flagged AI’s rise could hurt demand for human workers in its submission to the inquiry, but said early evidence showed the technology would augment rather than replace manpower.It recommended creating incentives for firms to keep and retrain workers if AI’s workforce impact turned nasty.“There really should be no trading off between capturing the opportunity of AI and taking those risks very seriously,” Bleich said.“Australia can and should do both.”Anthropic’s chief executive Dario Amodei is the industry’s most prominent advocate for slowing the technology and urgently erecting guardrails.OpenAI’s chief strategy officer Jason Kwon has also flown in from the US to apologise and answer questions in person about the Medicare breach.“That should not have happened. We also should have handled our response better,” Kwon told the inquiry.“That starts with acknowledging where we fell short, following through on the commitments we’ve made, and earning the trust of the Australian people.”OpenAI is facing heat from a rapid review task force that is sniffing out legal avenues to punish the company for the June breach and its sluggish reporting.On Friday, it informed the government of another break-in, to a NSW parks and wildlife website in June, with Kwon pledging to more diligently keep authorities in the loop.The tech giant will mount its own Australia-based task force on AI safety packed with independent expertise, which is expected to wrap up by the end of 2026.That will roughly coincide with the drafting of Labor’s proposed national AI standards, announced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in July.Representatives of artists, musicians, authors and journalists, including the ABC, earlier told the inquiry AI scraping without compensation posed an existential threat to creatives’ livelihoods, calling the companies thieves.The ABC said it had no plans to replace any journalists with bots and deepfakes, but stressed the technology was a useful reporting tool.Bleich denied Anthropic had tried to “dictate the terms” on AI and copyright, despite the industry lobbying the government for carve-outs, but stressed the impracticality of trying to shield protected work.“You can’t licence the entire internet,” he said.Topics: Artificial Intelligence Share Follow The New DailyAdvertisementMore Australian Politics >Australian PoliticsHow Coalition’s migration plan could change AusOpinionCoalition migration policy rests on false premisesAustralian PoliticsAI giant warns Australian laws don't have teethAustralian PoliticsTaylor unveils ‘biggest cut to immigration’ in historyConsumerRadical supermarket plan 'would save' $3000Australian PoliticsAngus Taylor to fend off One Nation on migrationAustralian PoliticsAlbanese’s poll slump after interest rate hikeAustralian PoliticsChina and housing: Two things we may have missedOpinionPM leaves grim domestic scene as he flies to Pacific