Back to Articles
World Champion of Appropriation: Grayson Perry Isn't Bothered by AI Using His Work

The Guardian

SKIPPED

Authors (1)

Description

Celebrated artist says AI is not very good yet, ‘so don’t worry’, in comments made at Charleston literature festival

Summary

Grayson Perry expresses a relaxed attitude towards AI-generated artwork derived from his work, noting the cultural tradition of appropriation and his belief that current AI capabilities lack the creativity to threaten artists. He suggests that while AI might handle mundane design tasks in the future, it is unlikely to produce truly compelling art due to its overly literal nature. The article underscores a broader discourse on AI's impact on creative professions but lacks a focused examination of existential or catastrophic risks associated with AI development. Despite his engagement with AI in his latest exhibition, Perry maintains a lighthearted view, reflecting broader cultural attitudes rather than specific policy implications related to AI safety.

Body

Perry with one of his artworks on display at his exhibition Grayson Perry: Delusions of Grandeur, which includes ceramics, tapestries, furniture and collage.Photograph: Kirsty Wigglesworth/APView image in fullscreenPerry with one of his artworks on display at his exhibition Grayson Perry: Delusions of Grandeur, which includes ceramics, tapestries, furniture and collage.Photograph: Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP‘World champion of appropriation’ Grayson Perry says he isn’t bothered by AI using his workCelebrated artist says AI is not very good yet, ‘so don’t worry’, in comments made at Charleston literature festivalGrayson Perry has said he doesn’t “really mind” if his work is used to train AI models, adding that throughout his entire career he had been “ripping off” others.Speaking at the Charleston literature festival, held on the grounds of the former home of the Bloomsbury Group artists Vanessa Bell and Duncan Grant, the artist jokingly referred to himself as “the world champion of cultural appropriation”.“I’ve never worried about if anyone wants to use my work in a lecture or whatever they want to do with it,” he said. Nor does he expect any money from those uses – partly because much of his work’s value comes from it being “physical” and “often unique”.However, the Turner prize-winning artist added that he was in “a luxurious position, being well-known”. He said he had never tried asking AI to make an image in the style of Grayson Perry.“Maybe I should ask that, that would be interesting,” he said. “Maybe I’ll get cross then, maybe I’ll be immediately signing a letter.”Grayson Perry: Delusions of Grandeur review – pomposity puncturing gets lost in personaeRead moreThe 65-year-old said he had been “tinkering” with AI, and his latest exhibition,Delusions of Grandeurat the Wallace Collection, includes AI-generated self-portraits. “My experience of AI is that it’s not that good yet, so don’t worry,” he said, adding that he was “not sure” if the models would ever become “amazingly creative”.But he does think AI is “going to do all the mediocre stuff” in the future. “If you’re a birthday card designer, you’re fucked.”Perry said he had recently used an AI tool and prompted it to create simply “an artwork”. The result showed a canvas that “looked like someone had just put all the colours on there”, he said. “I thought it was the perfect metaphor for what the internet does. It smooshes everything together into a bland paste. It does that with all culture.”He said AI art “went through this brilliant phase” when it tended to have a hallucinatory, “surreal, nice, interesting” quality to it. Now, though, AI had become “almost too good”, the artist said, describing it as being like “a very, very pedantic 14-year-old” that says: “Look at me, I can do a very realistic drawing”!View image in fullscreenPerry poses in front of one of his artworks on display at his exhibition.Photograph: Kirsty Wigglesworth/APPerry also said he believed “narrative is the most potent form of human art” – which is why he creates characters for himself – Claire, Alan Measles and most recently his alter ego “Shirley Smith”, who features as the “artist” behind his Wallace Collection works.He said he was “a bit envious” of artists of the past who “had religion” linked to “stories that everybody understood”, which they could reference in their work.Though he is “not spiritual”, he said he loved the idea of religion. “Spirituality has a relationship to religion like creativity has a relationship to art,” he said, adding that in both cases he was more interested in something definite than “vague thoughts” or “fuzzy woo woo”.Explore more on these topicsGrayson PerryArtExhibitionsArtificial intelligence (AI)newsShareReuse this content