Within a few days of the covid-19 lockdown in Oxford, UK, the street where philosopher Roman Krznaric lives had transformed. An email chain quickly morphed into a WhatsApp group with over 100 neighbors. Parents traded homeschooling tips and compared bread recipes. Food packages, coordinated via cell phone, were delivered to the  most vulnerable, and when Krznaric wanted to teach his 11-year-old twins Chinese calligraphy, two sets of brushes appeared on his doorstep.Krznaric sees in that mutual support the footprint of empathy, that ability to step into other people’s shoes in today’s world and understand their feelings and emotional needs. Having researched empathy for years, he has a trained eye for it. But as the covid-19 pandemic was raging in Europe and his WhatsApp group kept buzzing, he was pondering another question: Can humans make personal, empathetic connections with people we will never be able to meet and see?“If we want to be good ancestors, we should show future generations how we coped with an age of great change and great crises.”Jonas Salk“I had been writing books and lecturing and talking about empathy for many years,” says Krznaric, a self-proclaimed public philosopher. “But what I hadn’t thought about so much is this: How do we step into the shoes, not just across the space, but through time—with people in future generations?”This question guides Krznaric’s bookThe Good Ancestor: How to Think Long Term in a Short‑Term World. It is a volume brimming with ideas about how to combat “our pathological short-termism,” as he calls it. In the age of the “buy now” button, we are collectively failing to acknowledge how climate change, resource overconsumption, and biodiversity loss are sentencing coming generations to live on a chaotic planet.Empathy toward future generations is a way to think long. One can’t offer a cake, a hug, or words of support to people born in the 23rd century. But gifts and words are not the only means to convey care for another person, and as Krznaric writes, being a good Samaritan is no longer enough. The 21st century requires us to become good ancestors.The Good Ancestor: How to Think Long Term in a Short-Term World By Roman Krznaric; The Experiment, 2020, $25.95The book was conceived and written before the pandemic, and Krznaric only managed to squeeze in a coronavirus-­related preface before sending it to print and turning, like many others, to homeschooling kids and rearranging routines. The year quickly became all about evictions, exhausted health workers, police brutality protests, and bankruptcies on Main Street. “In the midst of such an immediate threat, what insights does long-term thinking offer?” he wrote in his preface.A first lesson, says Krznaric, comes from the way countries with longer-term pandemic plans, like Taiwan or South Korea, have dealt with the virus more effectively than those with none, like the US.Yet a deeper hint might come from Jonas Salk, the mid-20th-century virologist who coined the question-turned-maxim “Are we being good ancestors?” Salk might have recognized our frantic pursuit of a vaccine against covid-19 and the almost real-time news reports of lab trials, having risen to global fame for developing (and refusing to patent) the first effective vaccine against polio in 1955. Yet Salk always kept the long-term view. “If we want to be good ancestors,” he said in a 1967 speech, “we should show future generations how we coped with an age of great change and great crises.”Krznaric calls this the paradox of urgency. “In the very immediate moment, we need to be thinking long-term because of the urgency of the climate crisis,” he says. From our vantage point of 2020, it’s impossible to see how well we’ll cope with the multiple crises of climate change, coronavirus pandemic, and authoritarianism. Krznaric is the first to admit it could go either way: authoritarian regimes might try to cling to emergency powers they have granted themselves, while progressive cities like Amsterdam are actively reshaping their economies toward sustainability. Yet in the middle of the hurt and the economic suffering from covid-19, “something has happened to our sense of time,” he says. “It has enabled a moment to take stock.”hideKeep ReadingMost PopularEthically sourced “spare” human bodies could revolutionize medicineHuman “bodyoids” could reduce animal testing, improve drug development, and alleviate organ shortages.ByCarsten T. Charleswortharchive pageHenry T. Greelyarchive pageHiromitsu Nakauchiarchive pageAnthropic can now track the bizarre inner workings of a large language modelWhat the firm found challenges some basic assumptions about how this technology really works.ByWill Douglas Heavenarchive pageChina built hundreds of AI data centers to catch the AI boom. Now many stand unused.The country poured billions into AI infrastructure, but the data center gold rush is unraveling as speculative investments collide with weak demand and DeepSeek shifts AI trends.ByCaiwei Chenarchive pageOpenAI has released its first research into how using ChatGPT affects people’s emotional well-beingWe’re starting to get a better sense of how chatbots are affecting us—but there’s still a lot we don’t know.ByRhiannon Williamsarchive pageStay connectedIllustration by Rose WongGet the latest updates fromMIT Technology ReviewDiscover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.Enter your emailPrivacy PolicyThank you for submitting your email!Explore more newslettersIt looks like something went wrong.We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us atcustomer-service@technologyreview.comwith a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.