Sam Altman admits OpenAI cannot control Pentagon's use of AI
The Guardian
ENRICHED
Details
- Date Published
- 4 Mar 2026
- Priority Score
- 4
- Australian
- Unknown
- Created
- 5 Mar 2026, 02:00 am
Description
CEO’s claims come amid increased scrutiny of US military’s use of the technology and ethics concerns from AI workers
Summary
This article highlights a significant admission by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, stating that his company has no control over how the Pentagon utilizes its AI technology in military operations. This revelation emerges amidst growing concerns about the military's application of AI, ethical dilemmas among AI workers, and the potential for misuse in warfare. The piece contrasts OpenAI's position with that of Anthropic, which refused a Pentagon deal due to ethical reservations, and details the backlash OpenAI faced. The implications for AI safety and governance, particularly concerning dual-use technologies and accountability in military contexts, are substantial and warrant close attention.
Body
Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, attends a session at the AI Impact summit at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi, India, on 19 February 2026. Photograph: Rajat Gupta/EPAView image in fullscreenSam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, attends a session at the AI Impact summit at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi, India, on 19 February 2026. Photograph: Rajat Gupta/EPASam Altman admits OpenAI can’t control Pentagon’s use of AICEO’s claims come amid increased scrutiny of US military’s use of the technology and ethics concerns from AI workers
Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox
OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, told employees on Tuesday that his company does not control how the Pentagon uses their artificial intelligence products in military operations. Altman’s claims on OpenAI’s lack of input come amid increased scrutiny of how the military uses AI in war and ethics concerns from AI workers over how their technology will be deployed. “You do not get to make operational decisions,” Altman told employees, according to reports by Bloomberg and CNBC.“So maybe you think the Iran strike was good and the Venezuela invasion was bad. You don’t get to weigh in on that,” Altman reportedly said.OpenAI to work with Pentagon after Anthropic dropped by Trump over company’s ethics concernsRead moreThe AI industry has been mired in heated discussions and acrimonious negotiations in recent weeks as the Pentagon has demanded AI companies remove safety guardrails on their models to allow a broader range of military applications. AI-enabled systems have reportedly already been used in the US military’s operation to seize Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and in targeting decisions in its war against Iran.Anthropic, OpenAI’s rival and maker of the Claude chatbot, last week refused a deal with the Pentagon over concerns its model could be used for domestic mass surveillance or fully autonomous weapons. Pete Hegseth, the US defense secretary, declared the company a “supply-chain risk” as a result, a designation never used before against a US company and one that could cause significant financial harm if formally enacted.On the same day that Hegseth vowed punitive measures against Anthropic, the Pentagon also announced a deal with OpenAI that was seemingly intended to replace the use of Claude in military applications. The timing of the deal and concerns that OpenAI had agreed to cross ethical lines that Anthropic refused led to both public and internal employee backlash against OpenAI.Altman and OpenAI have since tried to insist that its technology will be used legally and conduct damage control, with Altman admitting that the deal was rushed out and made the company look “opportunistic and sloppy”.Anthropic’s CEO, Dario Amodei, lambasted Altman as “mendacious” in a memo to employees on Wednesday and accused Altman of giving “dictator-style praise to Trump” , the Information reported. “We’ve actually held our red lines with integrity rather than colluding with them to produce ‘safety theater’ for the benefit of employees (which, I absolutely swear to you, is what literally everyone at [the Pentagon], Palantir, our political consultants, etc, assumed was the problem we were trying to solve),” Amodei reportedly wrote.He also took aim at the Pentagon and Donald Trump.“The real reasons [the Pentagon] and the Trump admin do not like us is that we haven’t donated to Trump (while OpenAI/Greg have donated a lot),” he wrote, referring to Greg Brockman, OpenAI’s president, who gave a Pac supporting Trump $25m in conjunction with his wife.Explore more on these topicsTechnologyOpenAISam AltmanAI (artificial intelligence)US militarynewsShareReuse this content