UK Must Seize Initiative on AI or Be Left at Its Mercy, Liz Kendall Says
The Guardian
ENRICHED
Details
- Date Published
- 28 Apr 2026
- Priority Score
- 3
- Australian
- No
- Created
- 28 Apr 2026, 08:00 pm
Description
Technology secretary speaks amid concerns country is struggling to make its own way in AI
Summary
UK Technology Secretary Liz Kendall argues that the concentration of AI computing power within a small group of US-based firms poses a risk to national sovereignty and the ability to shape technology according to British values. The speech highlights internal government efforts to bolster domestic sovereign capabilities through state investment funds and semiconductor manufacturing plans as a counterweight to global dependencies. While rejecting calls for a development pause advocated by safety groups, the rhetoric emphasizes that failing to govern frontier AI development leads to a loss of control over catastrophic or systemic risks. This stance reflects a growing international trend where nations view AI governance not just as a safety issue, but as a critical component of economic and national security.
Body
Kendall said AI development was becoming concentrated within a few big tech companies, particularly in the US. Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing/Getty ImagesView image in fullscreenKendall said AI development was becoming concentrated within a few big tech companies, particularly in the US. Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing/Getty ImagesUK must seize initiative on AI or be left at its mercy, Liz Kendall saysTechnology secretary speaks amid concerns country is struggling to make its own way in AIBritain must seize the initiative on artificial intelligence or be left at the “mercy and whim” of a future shaped by the technology, Liz Kendall has said.The technology secretary said the country must have greater control over the industry as she highlighted big tech’s grip on its development, with 70% of the world’s AI computing power provided by US companies.In a speech on the UK’s ability to develop its own capabilities, Kendall said: “The choice isn’t between a world that has AI and one that does not. It is a choice between a world where we shape our AI future, based on our own interests and values, or where we are left at its mercy and whim.”Kendall highlighted the launch this month of a state AI investment fund as evidence of Labour’s support for domestic firms, and revealed the government was drawing up a plan to become more influential in designing and manufacturing the chips that power AI systems.The MP for Leicester West spoke amid concerns the UK was struggling to make its own way with the technology, despite producing a stream of academic talent and being the base for companies such as the UK-founded Google DeepMind. Last week Nick Clegg, the former deputy prime minister and, until recently, a senior Silicon Valley executive, said the UK was “without a single steam engine” in the AI revolution owing to factors such as high energy costs and an unresolved row over copyright.OpenAI, the US startup behind ChatGPT, has paused a multi-billion dollar datacentre project in the UK, citing high energy costs and regulation. The Guardian revealed recently that many of the deals to “mainline AI into the veins” of the British economy were “phantom investments”, and a supercomputer scheduled to go live in 2026 was still a scaffolding yard in Essex.Kendall singled out datacentres as an example of concentration in the AI market, with five US companies – Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle – controlling 70% of global AI computing, up from 60% a year ago.“Control of this incredibly powerful technology is becoming increasingly concentrated,” she said, adding that the UK “must shape this technology, not just be shaped by it”.However, Kendall said a push for AI sovereignty should not be seen as “weakening our deep, close and enduring relationship with the US”, the home of leading AI companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic.Kendall said calls to pause AI development would be a “betrayal of British talent and British interests”. In December, MPs at a Westminster Hall debate were urged to consider calls by the campaign group PauseAI for a hiatus in developing powerful AI systems.“It would send a message that Britain is closed to new ideas and new opportunities; that a country so rich in talent, innovation and enterprise has put an ‘out of office’ sign on its front door,” said Kendall.“If we retreat from progress we retreat from the world, leaving this powerful technology to be exploited by other nations to their advantage and our disadvantage.”Explore more on these topicsAI (artificial intelligence)Liz KendallComputingnewsShareReuse this content