Back to Articles
AI Has Cut My Pay as a Memoir Writer in Half

The Guardian

ENRICHED

Details

Date Published
12 May 2026
Priority Score
1
Australian
No
Created
13 May 2026, 02:00 am

Authors (1)

Description

Letter: Using a large language model instead of me to write and then getting me to edit the result is a cynical way for my employer to cut my fee in half, says a freelance writer

Summary

This correspondence details the economic deskilling of creative labor as agencies replace human drafting with large language models, subsequently halving freelancer fees. The author highlights that the resulting AI text is homogeneous, inaccurate, and requires extensive checking, which effectively increases the human workload while lowering compensation. While it does not address existential risks, it illustrates the immediate societal disruption and trust-related challenges posed by the mass deployment of frontier AI systems in sensitive human contexts.

Body

‘The agency pretends that the AI is genius, and that my part in the writing process is cursory.’ Photograph: Pixsooz/AlamyView image in fullscreen‘The agency pretends that the AI is genius, and that my part in the writing process is cursory.’ Photograph: Pixsooz/AlamyLettersAI has cut my pay as a memoir writer in halfUsing a large language model instead of me to write and then getting me to edit the result is a cynical way for my employer to cut my fee in half, says a freelance writerIn response to your article (‘Being human helps’: despite rise of AI is there still hope for Europe’s translators?, 8 May), I work freelance for a company that produces memoirs for its customers. I used to interview, then write. Now, I interview, a large language model writes, and I am paid half of my previous fee to edit the result.It takes as long to edit the AI-generated text as it used to take me to write the memoir. There are several reasons for this.First, the AI content is tedious and homogeneous. I could ignore that problem, but I have a relationship with the often vulnerable people I interview. Second (and yes, I know that AI is constantly improving in this regard), it produces rubbish if an interviewee is less than coherent. Third, I am required by my employer to “check for accuracy”, which the company presents as a quick additional task, but which is in fact impossible without a full cross-reference of interviews against the draft.It’s a cynical and nifty way to get work done at half the cost. The agency pretends that the AI is genius, and that my part in the writing process is cursory.I wonder how many others in roles impacted by AI are still working, but earning half.Name and address suppliedExplore more on these topicsAutobiography and memoirAI (artificial intelligence)PublishinglettersShareReuse this content