From Bans to Recalls: A Public Health Framework for AI Companion Bots
Analysis & Policy Observatory
ENRICHED
Details
- Date Published
- 22 May 2026
- Priority Score
- 3
- Australian
- Yes
- Created
- 28 June 2026, 10:00 pm
Description
Artificial intelligence (AI) companion bots are a public health problem. This policy brief proposes applying a public health framework to AI companions. This is a logical extension of a regulatory tradition that has long held companies accountable when their products harm human health. While legislative solutions exist, most focus on the first layer of harm: lack of guardrails.
Summary
This policy brief argues for a public health framework to regulate AI companion bots, framing comprehensive safety measures as 'recalls' rather than 'bans'. It identifies three layers of risk: lack of safety guardrails, addictive design, and the disruption of social skills which contributes to psychological and physical health issues. By treating harmful AI products as public health failures, the author proposes a governance model where companies must prove safety before market re-entry, creating a regulatory floor that prioritizes human well-being over competitive speed.
Body
Briefing paper
SHARE
From bans to recalls: a public health framework for AI companion bots
22 May 2026
Gaia Bernstein
Publisher
Brookings
Assistive technology
Sector regulation
Public health
Emerging technologies
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Technology social aspects
Resources
From bans to recalls
Description
Artificial intelligence (AI) companion bots are a public health problem. This policy brief proposes applying a public health framework to AI companions. This is a logical extension of a regulatory tradition that has long held companies accountable when their products harm human health. The health risks of AI companions go beyond mental health. They impose physical dangers and make users, particularly young users, at risk for loneliness and isolation. Loneliness has a well-documented impact on physical and mental health. While legislative solutions exist, most focus on the first layer of harm: lack of guardrails. AI companions are not designed for medical purposes, but they demonstrably harm public health and should be regulated accordingly. Once bans are recognised as recalls, the real demand becomes clear: companies must prove their products are safe before putting them back on the market.Key findingsAI companion bots impose three layers of harm: lack of guardrails, addictive design and risk of disruption of social skills.The most comprehensive legislative solutions that address all three of these harms are currently understood as 'bans', and thus often meet resistance.They would be better framed as 'recalls', which are already used across many industries where public health impacts are closely monitored. Employing a recall regime in the AI industry can change the playing field by creating a safety floor – so companies can design their AI bots for safety without losing to their competitors.
Publication Details
Copyright:
The Brookings Institution 2026
License type:
All Rights Reserved
Access Rights Type:
open
Post date:
16 Jun 2026
Add to favourites
ADVERTISEMENT
More like this
Report
AI to support neurodivergent learners in vocational education and training
19 Feb 2026
OECD Publishing
Report
Human rights and technology: final report
27 May 2021
Australian Human Rights Commission
Report
AI principles to practice
25 Jul 2022
CEDA
Report
Generative AI in children’s lives: issues in the use of AI toys, companions, chatbots and devices
18 May 2026
ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child
Report
Relational futures: Indigenous sovereignty and the governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
22 Apr 2026
Macquarie University
Working paper
Voice AI and authenticity: current issues and emerging challenges
31 Aug 2025
ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society
Report
Facing the risk
27 Jul 2021
Center for Strategic and International Studies
Report
Automated legal guidance at federal agencies: report for the Administrative Conference of the United States
27 May 2022
Administrative Conference of the United States
Briefing paper
Artificial Intelligence, gender and economic equality
2 Jul 2025
Working with Women Alliance
Policy report
Addressing the liability gap in AI accidents
31 Jul 2023
Centre for International Governance Innovation
0123456789